-
视频
视频
资讯
视频
资讯
Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
有一部描写错过的爱情的日本片，特有的孤独感，整片的叙事慢、慢、慢，爱的人很喜欢给5星，不爱的人觉得很闷的片，啥也讲不深刻，为赋新词强说愁，人物逻辑交代无法说服我，演员的表演也很淡。
7.0 完美阐述了《花束般的恋爱》里的那句“开始是结束的开始”。回忆里的人不会犯错，回忆里的人才会觉得错过
在这里，恋爱激情的消退乃至落幕，或都无需多么庄重的理由， 它更像是给尘埃落定后的自我重审，找回在情感中的自我心灵史而非实际经验，提供了必要的契机。
大一的短片剧本写过类似的故事，被泼冷水。后来看到好几个类似结构。有点可惜。
不错，感觉在本片中，松居大悟一直迷恋的时间结构才真正发挥作用。同一天的倒序排列共同组成一次漫长的闪回，剧场的相遇衔起首尾，正在发生的每一刻都与之前的某一刻构成精巧的呼应和微妙的共振，苦与乐、悲与喜、分离与相遇、沉默与言说、坚持与放弃互相交织映照。真唏嘘啊，我们注定在相拥的同时擦肩而过，正如你的生日总是超了7分钟，可是绿灯却刚好亮起，向前行驶，是你操纵了我的车灯，照亮前方的道路。
那无论怎么等，他都不来呢？偶尔也可以主动去见他
不错，感觉在本片中，松居大悟一直迷恋的时间结构才真正发挥作用。同一天的倒序排列共同组成一次漫长的闪回，剧场的相遇衔起首尾，正在发生的每一刻都与之前的某一刻构成精巧的呼应和微妙的共振，苦与乐、悲与喜、分离与相遇、沉默与言说、坚持与放弃互相交织映照。真唏嘘啊，我们注定在相拥的同时擦肩而过，正如你的生日总是超了7分钟，可是绿灯却刚好亮起，向前行驶，是你操纵了我的车灯，照亮前方的道路。
3.7 确实 原来的那些人 后来成了片段 在某些时候 稍微想起一些
那些真正时常闪回的片段，并不是《花束般的恋爱》中那么具象的音乐、小说。
除了伊藤是出租车司机和池松很喜欢地球之夜以外好像并不能说和原作有多大的关联。和住高円寺的朋友一起看说是发现了很多家附近的场景。尾崎已经这么もじゃもじゃ的了吗。
倒叙的电影，池松壮亮和伊藤沙莉的演技都好自然，感觉面前没有摄像机一般，喜欢最后半小时部分，水族馆、计程车、小屋、发夹、公园的镜头都很对味，还有最后的淡然看着夕阳，又是新的一天稍微回想起一些，但记忆也变旧了，变成闪闪发光落定的尘埃。be掉的爱情后劲真大啊……
有那么一瞬间，你发现我们之间的默契消失了。
与其说被主角感情的遗憾所触动，更多的是被疫情前的生活所触动。还有多久我们才能回归正常的生活？想去见一个人就能去见她，可以在深夜的路灯下大笑、举杯、舞蹈，可以去干任何想干的事，可以看着彼此的脸而不是通过记忆勾勒口罩下的样子。东京很大，上海很大，世界很大，如果不刻意去见，光是偶遇都要花掉太多的力气。很多人觉得这部好于花束，我不这么认为。也许是花束更对我胃口，也许是花束感情更充盈，也许是花束对我而言已经不是一部电影，是一段我驻足回望的美好时光，是开始，是纽带，是“我遇见了一个跟我想法一样的人”
水族馆和巷子里的舞，真美好。
意外对一个人的热情影响究竟有多大，又如何能跨越这种影响，也许永远是值得讨论的话题。
喜欢它的名字，稍微想起一些，好的，那就稍微。
倒叙的手法，先看了分手，于是之前的亲密都很刺眼，看得人心里有点淡淡的痛。什么也没发生，但就这样走散了。
稍微想起一些我们之前的事，一起养的猫咪、海洋馆的蓝色光景、成为电影明星和机械工的梦想、一直坐在长椅上等待离世妻子的男人、伴随着音乐起舞的我们。和梦想恋爱的男人与和现实恋爱的女人。她最后还是与百分之五百命中注定的男人在一起了。
看到一半的甜蜜想着为什么不正常点呢
喜欢水族馆里的轻盈起舞，喜欢出租车里的一边亲吻一边告白。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
