假体

假体 高清

评分：
9.0 推荐

分类： 喜剧片 2004

导演： 西里斯科什·慕克吉

立即播放 报错
排序

播放地址

剧情介绍

　　喜剧，讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人，周旋于女友和未来岳父之间，因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人，认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。
　　Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.
　　Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.
　　The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.
　　Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).
　　Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.
　　Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.
　　In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.
　　On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).

猜你喜欢

评论:

  • 易运乾 5小时前 :

    Peter的形象被演绎得太过人畜无害，以至于即便片尾几乎点明了真相，却也难以让人接受。但回过头来再看影片开头，其实一切问题也就都迎刃而解了，观影过程中那些细小的看似不合理的地方也就有了合理解释。编绳一段剧情原本平淡如水，却被刻意配上了冲击感极强的音乐，个中深意也确实事后才能知晓。Phil无疑是在用绝情伪装自己，把所有情感藏在私人空间，却不曾想被Peter无意闯入，暴露了自己的最大弱点，难得唤醒的一片真情，终究是错付了。

  • 剑长娟 6小时前 :

    给出符合我第一观感的评价。看完全片有一种被折磨了2小时的痛苦，大概过于平淡细腻的电影不适合我这断断续续的观影方式吧。刚看完的时候也确实没太懂发生了什么，但看了豆瓣评论后对故事理解是没问题了，那再回想下我到底是为什么这么不喜欢这片。首先是故事性，看的时候不知道导演想把我带到哪儿，也不知道人物动机。然后是一种对男权和另一种“魔法”(仅以Peter为代表)的突兀描绘：不明白为啥要“男权”下的Phil作茧自缚自我阉割到这种程度，难道没有一点可调和的空间？导演再一次只给了我们结果而不给解释。另一种“魔法”(仅以Peter为代表)，更是不知道如何分类？集女性魅力、细腻、阴冷，与男性刚毅果决冷酷于一身，况且真的恋母一种说法就能解释他的动机吗？不能吧？

  • 字乐蓉 5小时前 :

    经过了 2021 年后，电影中描写的世界末日都是可以忍受的了……

  • 安颐然 3小时前 :

    简.坎皮埃对影片整体的克制和控制力太惊人了。就像她当年和《霸王别姬》一起得金棕榈双黄蛋的的《钢琴课》一样，散文化的叙事，优美的配乐，精简扼要的台词，一笔带过的冲突，氛围营造大于叙事交代，表面波澜不惊实则暗流汹涌。开始你以为她要讲一个西部牛仔的纯爷们直男情感的故事，中间你以为她要讲的是罗丝不屈不挠战胜傲慢与偏见赢得和解的故事，中后部分你以为她要讲的是少年皮特的成长，一个柔弱少年与老男人尽释前嫌，产生基情，然后成长为一个成熟牛仔的故事，到最后其实她讲的是，少年为了母亲甚至有可能为了财产谋杀了老男人的故事。你不能指望所有观众都要去细读原著再来对比，然后完成留白的填空。电影文本首先就应该是自我成立逻辑自洽的闭环体裁。生发太多的想象无异于2次创作了。因克制而留白，因故意留白而玄虚。玄之又玄，不啻矫饰。

  • 幸芳茵 0小时前 :

    疫情前拍的真有先见之明啊。资本>意识形态>真相。地球被他们玩坏了，但他们活下来了。

  • 富察合美 7小时前 :

    2个小时的短片还切成几个章节多此一举，蒙大拿的风光毫无体现，远不如黄石。南通真的恶臭！

  • 卫俊辰 1小时前 :

    无论是女主、少年还是卷福，情感总显得冒然，冒然的背后就是线的断裂。

  • 卫泓辰 6小时前 :

    2022.3.28 空镜是我喜欢的类型，但是和片子交融的不那么合适，就算是卷福蓄起胡须，也没有西部那种野性的感觉。狂野下的细腻，不可言说的压抑。所以是自己杀死了自己、还是被“羊”干掉？主要很多暗示，不知道是不是我想太多了。

  • 墨宏阔 4小时前 :

    cringe, absurd, satiric, triggering, helpless, despairing, but the world needed this

  • 宝彤云 8小时前 :

    这部电影还是比较含蓄，就和男主压抑的情绪一样。

  • 仵和宜 5小时前 :

    ▫️竟然有很多人觉得这部电影“讽刺”的不够高级，What？！我觉得这已经不叫讽刺了，这根本就是毫不掩饰的现实世界！！每天的阴间新闻难道不比拍出来的要更傻逼更让人震惊100倍吗！！不是电影不高级，是这个FuckingWorld本来就低级！！把“彗星撞地球”换做任何一个全球事件，简直就可以当作是记录片看，世界，妙不可言。

  • 孛怜雪 9小时前 :

    新冠爆发的这几年很多事和三星中将贩卖白宫免费零食一样荒唐

  • 康晨 6小时前 :

    波米说这部电影建构了“新集权”框架——第四权力下放，大数据、流量经济、官能刺激绑架议程设置→后真相时代，信息战与认知战、转移焦点、“等反转” ——也是搭建在对人类这一认知之上的必然，所以彗星最终也必然落下。

  • 拓跋谷秋 1小时前 :

    2个小时的短片还切成几个章节多此一举，蒙大拿的风光毫无体现，远不如黄石。南通真的恶臭！

  • 招凝竹 3小时前 :

    不是隐喻，已经是声嘶力竭的明喻了。用力过猛，没有举重若轻的感觉，好的黑色喜剧不是这样。真的从头到尾，一丁点都笑不出来。

  • 妍玉 4小时前 :

    千万别把这部电影当喜剧来看！这tmd不是我们当今社会的现象吗？全球变暖，冰川融化，越看越觉得毛骨悚然......

  • 况嘉宝 6小时前 :

    英国气质混搭西部片。

  • 彩玥 8小时前 :

    故弄玄虚，接受无能。最动人的一幕是新婚夫妇在旷野中跳舞。另外，不露屁股就会被英国男演员协会开除对吧？

  • 坚茂德 6小时前 :

    看似man得要死的爷们 结果也有弯弯的柔情

  • 单于翰采 4小时前 :

    衣冠楚楚的现代性年轻人取代了老派牛仔还隐喻了文明社会与蛮荒的冲突，整立意不可谓不高。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved