Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
充满想象力，也是一部真正的国产动画大片，可怜现在的国产动画质量实在太次了
春晚小品十五分钟的故事情节，拍了一部一个半小时的电影。看简介黑色幽默和演员阵容觉得还可以，结果既不黑色也不幽默，烂！
1、几只狐狸和小孩怪可爱的；2、仙人像普罗米修斯，不过技术有点儿落后，有现在的复印技术，人人都有一本天书不是梦；3、天庭保护天书的护法也太简陋了；4、天庭罗汉式的设置挺好，希望仙侠电视剧能参考；5、小孩就是仙人的继承人（克隆体）吧，一模一样的标记😄；6、几个狐狸很天然，很野性；7、山水园林的场景好评，让我想起小时候房子里挂的山水画；
精良的动画呀 仔细看 跑动中的背景没有一张重复的 这就是态度！！
好看 我喜欢 艾米莉超美的 本是玫瑰 向往自由 人总是踏出第一步后才开始后悔
云梦山上白云洞，洞中石壁，刻有天书，袁公将其传与蛋生，造福百姓，吃了仙丹的三条狐狸，招摇撞骗，偷了天书，从百姓一路骗到县令、府尹、小皇帝，蛋生与狐母斗法，不分上下，终得袁公出手，改编自平妖传，钱运达所言奇趣美，不能反驳。
好简单个故事，连场景都只有那么一个。而且没有大波折，这种遭遇、绑架、监禁的戏居然一点紧张感都没有，有点无趣。
莉莉夫妻档作品。在相对来说的小空间里，拍摄和剪辑都比较慢，故事本身的吸引性也不够，最后堆的高潮10分钟也没什么用。我不太理解人物突然的动机，显得有些无聊吧
女狐狸：桃花，乱花渐欲迷人眼，胭脂水粉惑人心。
杰西普莱蒙越来越比马特达蒙强大。不要剥夺女人的自信心，要听她说话，要把她放在眼里心里，不然就是几枪、几下板，终结一切，走自己的路。
袁公：三千年兢兢业业不曾犯错，传真理刀山火海敢为人先。
致敬经典，这是真正的国漫之光！
这片子烂到我不想探讨它本身，只想八卦Lily Collins.
年轻狐狸精还真美。袁公乃中国的普罗米修斯呵。
脸谱化是特色，也是思维欠缺的固化，要减少这类思想的入侵。
一部很磨人心性的影片。结局当然预料之外，却也难言情理之中，也许是对摆脱人生困境的一种象征吧。
剧情很扯，罪犯无脑至极，女权yy片
这部我小时候没看过诶！补了之后感觉很喜欢！
小学上课的时候做了本 天书 被老师批评了....
“奇、趣、美”，“探民族风格之路，敲喜剧样式之门”；
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
