Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
男主表演可以，女主也没有掉线，节奏有些拖沓，只能快进 主题营造还是不错的
剧情逻辑差到了一个前无古人的境界，是不是后无来者很不好说，江山代有才人出啊，你有充足的理由相信一个五年级的小学生会写的更好，甚至再大胆一点，一条狗扒拉几下出来的玩意都会更赏心悦目一些。
当爽片看没问题，但就别琢磨了。
原汁原味，如果喜欢剧版前半段的话值得一看。虽然相似度有点太高，没啥突破之处，但作为一部番外网络电影也够看了，毕竟看这片就是图一个乐呵嘛。
科幻+灾难的两者融合其实还可以了，地球外科幻片，地球内灾难片，影片整体也有不错的看点：假设月球撞地球的众多理论一一可视化展现，也许有些逻辑经不起推敲，但这种片子已经可以了，不过与导演之前的作品《2012》和《后天》比较，略显平庸。
作为剧版的番外电影，大马猴终于当了大王，整体及格哦
倒霉到了一个特别差的影厅，屏幕太差看得整个画面又灰又蓝仿佛在看枪版，所以完全体会不到震撼的视觉效果。除此之外的剧情都让人昏昏欲睡，所以断断续续又睡又醒只看了个故事概要，也就只能打这么高了。（毕竟整体内容没办法做到抛开特效还能让我专注的程度）
电影院第一天开放，排片少，居然没赶上imax。因为小学的时候太喜欢他的《独立日》（没错就是那个港译《天煞：地球反击战》的片子）了，所有艾默里奇作品额外加一星。这一部就是艾默里奇正常发挥吧，有槽点但不算硬伤，笑笑开心就好。最重要的是他的片子广电也找不到茬夏姬八删，总归比精灵旅社和去罗琳化的神奇动物可靠一点。
唉，政治正确的美国大片就像要过广电审核一样难看！这次雷克萨斯还真是大金主！
It's more like a drama than a sci-fi movie, with stereotypical scenes.
就是文戏太多的灾难片，后面转型为科幻片。就观感很无聊，后面的特效土到掉渣。
所有橋段都太陳舊，特效沒看頭，陰謀論懶得編理由，負責搞笑的胖子也不好笑。
节奏太快，结构老套，科幻硬伤，不经推敲，唯一的优点就是特效不赖。
原汁原味，如果喜欢剧版前半段的话值得一看。虽然相似度有点太高，没啥突破之处，但作为一部番外网络电影也够看了，毕竟看这片就是图一个乐呵嘛。
3.5；效果还是不错的，可惜大家对这种灾难套路实在审美疲劳了；难得在影视作品里看到戴森球
回归到了喜剧风格还是很好看的，比电视剧的后半段要有意思多了。
设计很儿戏，但拍得不儿戏——它自然很难看。儿戏有儿戏的玩法。
从《赘婿》等近两年的国产ip可以看出，制作方都是生意人，自然是各方都要讨好。女性觉醒、女性就业、新时代男女关系、商业模式，再套个架空王朝的壳子。在我这个外行看来，挺不错了。
抢鲜，机翻字幕，快进。即使套路，不够惊艳，毕竟用大制作的效果拍出以前没拍过的东西，让我的兴致不错，3星半。以后出来翻译精修版，我想再从头来一遍
即便我一直不太计较科幻片的科学逻辑，只要特效视觉看得爽就好。但你们这么忽悠我有点过分了啊！其他不说，地球的武器就能那么轻易摧毁外星人工智能？你们确定这不是在侮辱我的智商？气愤！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
