A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
虽然但是 请不要共情人口贩子不要随便生孩子
水土不服的问题已经说烂了，但放到同是东亚文化语境下的韩国，比《真相》还是强一些的。
怎么可以这么无聊且寡淡，看完什么记忆点都没有
不懂就问：《小偷家族》成功之余，一定要搞一个棒子低配版拉低自己的身价吗？
情感丰富、意味深远 浮光掠影中捕捉到了生命、家庭以及生存的意义
两星半。人物关系的骨架和《小偷家族》如出一辙，叙事节奏同样相当舒缓，但效果却大打折扣。究其原因，倒不是换了韩国的表达语境，而是是枝裕和擅长的细节中寻求变奏，在剧本层面更多只是展示问题，并没有太多情和理的细腻探索。渐渐地，舒缓沦为了失焦。动人之处依旧存在，却很是松散。裴斗娜和宋康昊对于表演的控制，相较他人明显高出一个段位，尤其在电影节语境中，宋康昊角色的人物设定对于评委来说，是很有记忆点的。
丢个娃卖个娃扯了两个小时……各种尬出天际的台词，韩版麻油年纪轻轻就要给所有人当妈怀疑导演是不是缺乏母爱，附加史上最无聊宋康昊，不愧是是枝裕和
一股子《小偷家族》味，没想到还真是是枝裕和导的，但比《小偷家族》差远了，一些用心设计的走心对话和动作显得过于刻意。看着IU在这部戏里的表演就像看《我的大叔》。剧情设置也有点松散，前面看得打瞌睡。
“拟似家族”模板套韩国演员，处处都能看出对演员表演的不自信，用各种镜头戏法掩饰关键段落的演员表演。剧作上给人物上了太多道德保险，用一堆“迫不得已”来妄求观众理解，可要知道情感真实这回事并不止于对白、段落的啊。所谓的“孩子”只是道具，“孩子的幸福”只是虚伪的道德崇拜，剧作越保守越背离情感。《晨曦将至》比它好一万倍。
是没人没故事可讲了吗？非得又讲小偷又讲人贩子的，说白了，不也是一种算计和偷懒吗？
原本很好的基础结构，故事性太不耐看了。很日式的电影，只有宋大叔和若干个配角显得游离在平淡的其他演员和布景之外。
4.男主在列车上问女主之前留下字条是会接回孩子及如果舍不得可以留下孩子时，每当女主真心想回答时列车都进入隧道，银幕黑屏……表明女主不能正面面对的这个镜头设计给人留下深刻的印象
电影好慢热，感情在线，依旧是是枝裕和，少了些韩国本身的味道。我觉得在成熟度上又回归了下，而不像小偷家族那样是被所有人喜欢。我还蛮喜欢的。女主演的真好。
too tedious to watch
影帝的话我觉得姜东元演的更好啊，开头感觉在看电视剧，还是日本式内敛版的，这么好的题材可发挥的部分拍的如此平淡如白开水,是枝一直就很中庸，中规中矩一向如他，近一点的《小偷家族》远一点的《如父如子》《无人知晓》都是类似题材翻来覆去的拍没有一点惊喜
某一瞬间，仿佛在看《小偷家族》。经历了一段迷乱之后，是枝裕和在这部作品里拾回了一些初心。
比较失望，水土不服较为严重的一部作品，故事仅流于表面，失去了是枝裕和的特色
体量上就感觉是小做一波，但这种片子拍出来确实自己开心啊，挺满意的
低配版《小偷家族》，海报就能看到完全是想延续小偷家族的设定，从人物的塑造到“家庭关系”的搭建，与前作如出一辙。但是真的太莫名其妙了，感觉电影完全没有展开在讲一个故事，所有的角色都立不住，人物之间的情感也让人觉得无法共情。甚至，刑警这条线没有啥存在的必要，也不知道为什么宋康昊会凭借这个角色拿了影帝，这戏份没有IU的一半多，节奏也很平我全程都在不是吧，就这，这就没了？
还是那样温柔的是枝裕和，从不刻意煽情的剧情，但却最为感人。他们是掮客，是杀人犯、性工作者，是孤儿，但却不是恶人。（裴斗娜又演女警，梦回李英男哈哈
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
