Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
还不错 支持下小崔 有点类似无间道 黑白真的就没有灰色地带么
勉强三颗星，剧情还是有点乱，细节精彩的地方也很少
论警察白与黑之间的地带，影片一直看到结尾，我都觉得没有啥需要推理的，剧情挺直白的啊！都明明白白地告诉观众了。影片不能说无聊或者枯燥，虽然剧情一环扣一环的比较紧凑，但质量只能说还行，因为剧情既无意外也无反转，对抗和冲突都不尖锐，所以真的说不上精彩和激烈。赵震雄演技在线，但我觉得他这个角色应该带一点邪意，剧情把他拍得过于正直了，这样失去了神秘感，也就减低了这个角色的魅力。这质量我很努力的想给4星，可还是做不到，我只能给3星6.7分！
期待后面的续集吧 希望有哦
看着让我想起了日本的孤狼之血，感觉没有很大创新。
说实在的，我是冲着宇植去看的，可是我感觉自己没看懂甚至以为看到了删减版…很多地方都说不通啊…唉……是我的原因？
说教性太强。但拍摄真的很有趣，小演员们给力。
期待看到真人电影《魔方大厦》、《红沙发音乐城》、《五个苹果折腾地球》、《智齿》等能够成为经典的那一天。。。
2022年的第一个四星作品。
童话电影，但是适合大朋友小朋友一起看，不愧是郑渊洁...故事好看，有笑有泪，不突兀不说教；小朋友演技自然不出戏！！好看喜欢！
故事一般般，甚至有点平庸，没有韩国电影平时的那种凌厉和节奏。
有点幼稚的戏码，头牌警察用非常手段抓贼，检察派卧底去调查问题警察。渐渐被感染用了也用非常手段了。结果正义主义。
何为正义，崔宇植最后和大佬谈话时那个眼神绝了，真帅
小学的时候订阅了《童话大王》，郑渊洁真的是一个神奇的人，他的童话写给大人也写给小孩儿。
节奏略显松散，剧情尚可，小崔演技炸裂，多给一星。
（二星半与三星之间）
太一般了，两个小时都坚持不下去，像是给小孩拍的无脑爽片
为了犯罪题材和崔宇植来看的，但是说实话，不是很理想。一方面可能是节奏不当，还有导演显得青涩的镜头语言。
优秀儿童片。受众定位很明确，就是当代儿童观众和已成长为一代家长的上世纪郑渊洁读者，各方面都做的很好。有点遗憾的是，没能拍出郑渊洁完整的意韵，黑色的底调浪费了。极其直接甚至露骨的主题表达非常有郑氏的特点。期待后面的改编，希望能有儿童片以外的规划。
对传统教育唯分数论的批判很大胆，但是小人教他们作弊确实不应该，还有小曼，竟然把那么小个孩子塑造成反派一样的人物确实不太好。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
