Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
我这种文化沙漠干嘛要看这部电影啊！完全就是被预告片巨人给吸引罢了！
用意我大概能明白，用一种反英雄的方式来重新讲高文的故事，里面有一些很特别的隐喻是不是有些晦涩了。但是光影和景色实在太美了，形式上充满了Anglo-Saxon时期的神秘感，配乐也特别棒，几段吟唱太美了。Green Chapel实在太漂亮了。(但漏雨)
黄粱一梦，放在中国，就是得道升天，或是遁入空门的路径。
如果DIVERSITY和ZZZQ就意味着秦始皇得由非我族类来演的话，那我宁可“落后”
3.5。在濃重的悼亡情緒之下，電影其實早已形神皆散，徒留下前後照應的戲劇結構和厚重手法續著最後一絲精氣神。
David Lowery 在改写强化 Gawain 的性格 以及对于真·骑士精神的探索 五德不存的 只能意淫且没有得到原有的 Lord 可是成片从头至尾的表面“精良" 除了能力证虚弱硬装阳刚之外 别无他效 小狐狸也是假的 绿丝带也是编的 自作聪明的一种美学
一部个人化的作品，献给已过世的兄弟。记忆已经褪色，未来是五彩斑斓的。
男人之间的勇敢者游戏。虽然保持了 Lowery 鬼魅游离慢悠悠的风格，但这个高文爵士塑造的真是一言难尽，后半段 Joel 出现时才开始进入正常状态。
4.3/光线和布景的美学体验太棒了，以及令人震惊的配乐，已经顾不上故事的沉闷拖沓以及各种莫名其妙，小伙子加冕的一刻有被帅到，脑海中的内心戏很丰富。还沉浸在配乐和视效中久久不能自拔。
还挺吃导演这一套，算是这种题材里比较看得下去的片儿了
整部影片还没有简介精彩，可能电影实在过于冗长，完全没有神秘感和紧凑的情节。
画面没得说。情绪不好看不下去。21/08/20
[Berlinale Competition] L'Avventura
挺好看，但是总觉得情感上还是缺点什么，不够饱满
这松松垮垮的节奏….是在消磨我的耐心吗……无聊至极
【Ralph Ineson的映前导赏又有用又可爱~】莫名对标的是好几个有着接近背景的作品：《天命之咒》、Taron版《罗宾汉》、Fuqua04版《亚瑟王》….无一滑铁卢。繁复的大场面和高昂的制作投入虚有其表，却总是忽视了角色“现代性”行动逻辑与时代的格格不入。然而这里却是个全然不同的故事，角色自己的历程与道德式剖析在其中紧密相扣，并不急于快进到更为直观的结果与转折。观众可以知道TA所了解之外的，而导演也清楚自己要在“之外的”做怎样的开拓。但恨不得辱骂A24宣发，Dev Patel的下一提怕是要被你吃了。
借作家死后归乡之旅以及多个文本，来表达导演自己的告别，情绪很满，有时候超出了内容本身。归乡部分描述了战后意大利的社会百态和情感归宿，情緖不至于空乏没有着落。最后的《钉子》，继续在精神上（包含合作）对逝去表态，完成告别。
有些个人主义色彩，但欠缺时间感的史诗改编片。非叙境元素的运用（提示性的字幕）也把想表达的人物内在成长和经典故事本身的“传奇”属性区分开来，整体的观感挺割裂的，但表层的奇幻历程和内里主人公心灵的成长之间莫名有一种难以言说的张力
以皮兰德娄的身后骨灰为始发点，巨大的争议与巨大的荣耀都曾聚焦于这位作家身上，回溯那“恐怖、野蛮、挣扎的十年”，藉由魂归大海而达成漫长的告别；未完成的告别则不仅是皮兰德娄遗作——《钉子》化为影片第二部分，更是“To my brother”——保罗·塔维亚尼对哥哥的纪念，两部分的捏合通过一位作家和黑白/彩色的切换达到转承。
骨灰、棺材、坟墓，死亡是主题。沉重的历史缅怀＞盖过了这部电影本身。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
